Risk · Moratoriums & Local Opposition

Community Opposition

Formal moratoriums, zoning bans, and legislative proposals restricting new data center development, by jurisdiction.

Confidence A Directly reported figure B Estimated / Derived C Regional inference / indirect estimate D Not found / insufficient data

US markets (10)

10 MARKETS
MarketStatusDetailDate Enacted/EffectiveConfidence
US moratorium tracker (aggregate)Trend/count7 moratoria (2023), 6 (2024), 59 (2025), 294 in first 7 months of 2026 (June alone: 80)2018-2026 (tracked monthly)A
Hillsboro, ORIn force120-day moratorium on new land use applications for data centers and BESS sites; does not affect existing/already-submitted projects; may be extended another 120 daysJul 27, 2026A
Seattle, WAPending/proposedProposed 365-day moratorium (extendable 6 months), pending city impact reports on grid, water, rates, land use, jobs, and health.Apr 30, 2026 (introduced)A
Louisville / Jefferson County, KYIn forceMetro Council approved a moratorium; a separate Greenberg-administration rule would ban hyperscale (>500,000 sq ft) data centers outright, with distance requirements for smaller ones.Aug 13, 2026A
Jackson Township / Pleasant Township, OHIn forceTwo adjacent townships each passed 1-year moratoriums2026A
Multiple Florida countiesIn force (various)Moratoriums pausing data center applications for up to 12 months2026B
Ohio (statewide ballot measure)Failed to qualifyProposed constitutional amendment to ban data centers over 25 MW; gathered ~70,000 of the 413,488 signatures required by the July 1, 2026 deadlineJul 1, 2026 (deadline missed)A
Michigan (statewide bills)Introduced, not enactedHB 5594-5596 and SB 1018-1020 (statewide moratorium bills) reintroduced June 2026 alongside a Senate Democratic regulatory package2026-06 (reintroduced)A
US federal (Congress)Introduced, not enactedS.4214, "Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act" -- would halt new AI data center construction nationwide pending federal AI safety legislationJul 18, 2026 (introduced)A
States moving the opposite direction (pro-development)Enacted (protective/regulatory, not prohibitive)Florida protected local land-use authority; Oklahoma's Data Center Customer Protection Act; Maryland's Utility RELIEF Act; Idaho requires a "no harm" test for loads >50 MW.2026B

International markets (15)

15 MARKETS
MarketStatusDetailDate Enacted/EffectiveConfidence
Amsterdam, NetherlandsIn forceData center development moratoriumOngoing as of 2026A
Dublin, Ireland (EirGrid)Lifted with conditions2021/2022 moratorium on new grid connections lifted Dec 2025, conditional on on-site generation/battery capacity and 80% renewable sourcing within 6 yearsDec 12, 2025 (lifted)A
DenmarkIn forceTemporary pause on new large-consumption grid connections (not data-center-specific, but data centers are the primary driver): ~60 GW queued vs. 7 GW national peak demand2026A
JLL community-acceptance survey findingSentiment gap35% local acceptance level vs. 93% national support level -- a 58-point gap2026A
Iver (Court Lane), Buckinghamshire, UKReversed on appeal, then legally challenged againRefused 2024, approved on appeal by Angela Rayner; Jan 2026 judicial review (Foxglove/Global Action Plan) found a "serious logical error" in the approval, which should be quashed.2024 (refused) -> Rayner approval -> Jan 22, 2026 (quashed)A
Abbots Langley, Hertfordshire, UKRefused, pending appeal96MW data center development rejected2026-01 (rejected)A
Havering (East London), UKIn force, contested600MW, £5.3bn, 12-building, 175-acre Green Belt campus by Digital Reef; council-backed, opposed by residents/Friends of the Earth over long construction impact and Green Belt "creep".2026 (ongoing)A
Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire, UK (AWS-linked)Opposed, campaign group formally requesting refusalFoxglove asked the UK government to refuse permission pending answers on power/water availability and emissions — for this site and as general future policy.Jun 12, 2025 (campaign statement)A
UK (national policy)New centralized approval pathway (reduces local veto power)Infrastructure Planning Regulations 2026 let data centers use the NSIP regime — a centralized process bypassing local councils for the largest developments.2026-01 (in force)A
UK (public sentiment research)Sentiment/procedural findingAnalysis of 807 public comments across 4 UK data center planning applications concludes "the consultation system may be structurally misaligned with the scale of public concern it is now expected to handle"Jun 10, 2026B
Netherlands (grid-capacity conflict)Grid operator warning, new-home connections pausedTenneT has paused new-home electricity connections in affected regions, warning data-center demand is contributing to grid overload risk.Feb 12, 2026A
Amsterdam, Netherlands (moratorium fallout)Documented casualty of the moratorium/grid-priority conflictA Microsoft hyperscale project reportedly proceeded despite the local ban; reporting says 50 schools/daycares couldn't be built because a data center got priority grid access.Jan 26, 2026B
Aragon region, SpainActive development, contested on renewable-land-competition groundsData centers under construction in Aragon would consume approximately 9x more electricity than all other current economic activity in the region combined, and would occupy up to 32% of land earmarked for renewable energy generation2026B
Ireland (national economic cost)Quantified household costData-center electricity demand added an est. €360/household (2015-2023) and drained ~€715M from the economy; only 0.1% of the workforce (~3,300 people) works in data centers.2015-2023 (cumulative)B
EU-wide (advocacy proposal, not policy)Proposed (not enacted)A coalition of European civil-society researchers has published a formal public call for a temporary EU-wide moratorium on large data centers pending better data and democratic deliberationJul 28, 2026B