Risk · Water Scarcity

Water Stress by Market

How exposed each data center market is to water scarcity and drought, and what it actually costs to run cooling water there — scarcity and price, side by side.

Confidence A Directly reported figure B Estimated / Derived C Regional inference / indirect estimate D Not found / insufficient data

Category and score follow WRI Aqueduct's baseline water stress classification i above — click for methodology. Water Rate is each market's non-domestic tariff from the public utility rate schedule, in USD per unit — click the unit pill in a table header to switch $/m³ and $/kGal, or hover a rate for its local-currency source.

US markets (14)

14 MARKETS
MarketCategoryWRI Score iKey RiskConfidenceWater Rate iRate Conf.
Phoenix, AZExtremely High5.0Colorado River allocation cuts; basin stress +17%; ~870% growth vs. planned capacityA$1.99B
Denver, COExtremely High5.0South Platte/Colorado basin: depletion also Extremely High (>75%); groundwater declining 2-4 cm/yr — most-stressed major US market.A$1.53A
Dallas-Fort Worth, TXExtremely High4.2Trinity River basin (>80% withdrawal ratio); moderate drought risk; competing municipal/agricultural demand.A$1.74B
Minneapolis, MNHigh3.5Upper Mississippi basin — higher than the prior 'abundant supply' assumption; agricultural withdrawal pressure.A$1.37A
Reno, NVHigh3.1Truckee River basin confirms Nevada's arid-state exposure at basin level.A$1.16A
Northern Virginia, VAMedium-High (seasonal)3.0Potomac River peak-day shortfall risk by 2030; data center share of WMA supply ~4x by 2035 (8% to 25%)A$2.01A
Atlanta, GAMedium-High3.0Chattahoochee basin interstate water disputes (GA/AL/FL); periodic droughtC$2.18A
Austin, TXMedium-High2.8Colorado River (TX) basin — lower than the prior statewide estimate; moderate drought risk; Hill Country aquifer pressure not captured by the basin score.A$1.47B
Columbus, OHMedium-High2.8Scioto River basin — higher than the prior 'Great Lakes abundance' assumption; moderate drought risk.A$2.27C
Boston, MAMedium-High2.2Coastal MA/southern New England basin — higher than the prior 'Northeast abundance' assumption.A$3.37A
Silicon Valley, CALow-Medium1.8South SF Bay coastal sub-basin — markedly lower than the prior statewide CA drought estimate; local desal/recycled-water supply offsets basin stress.A$3.28C
Chicago, ILLow1.0Great Lakes basin -- abundant surface water supplyB$1.32A
New York/New Jersey, NY/NJ/CTLow0.4Northern NJ corridor (Newark/Secaucus/Elizabeth); Hudson-Raritan estuary sub-basin confirms abundant supply.A$1.07B
Portland, ORLow0.0Willamette River basin confirms Pacific Northwest abundance.A$2.88A

International markets (8)

8 MARKETS
MarketCategoryWRI Score iKey RiskConfidenceWater Rate iRate Conf.
Singapore, SingaporeExtremely High5.0Water import dependency (Malaysia); +300MW new capacity approved despite constraints; regulatory limitsA$0.96A
Sydney, AustraliaMedium-High2.9Country baseline stress; drought exposure; projected to approach High by 2050B$2.06A
Frankfurt, GermanyMedium-High2.0Country baseline stress, per WRI classification.B$2.79B
Tokyo, JapanLow-Medium2.0Country baseline; typhoon-driven seasonal variability offsets average abundanceB$1.09C
Paris, FranceLow-Medium1.9Country baseline; forecast to move into Medium-High by 2025 per WRI projectionsB$1.24A
Amsterdam, NetherlandsMedium1.6Hyperscale ban (>70MW) and moratorium on new builds -- policy-driven constraint, not pure scarcityA$1.27A
London, UKLow-Medium1.3Country baseline; South East England faces the highest sub-national stress in the UKB$3.14A
Dublin, IrelandLow1.0Generally abundant national supply; no major WRI-flagged basin stress identifiedC$1.64A