Concept

Risk-Adjusted Pricing

Concept — framework and worked mechanics, not a published benchmark

Five weighted Azraq KRI pillars, each scored 1.00–5.00, combined into an overall risk score R and laid over the rate benchmark. Markets are plotted on two axes — what they cost against what they carry — and R is converted back into a price.

Risk pillars

AZRAQ SCORE R · 1.00–5.00
Cohort median R
2.62
across 16 markets
Lowest risk
2.02
Sydney
Highest risk
3.30
Amsterdam
Spread
1.28
all inside one band of the 1–5 scale

Move a weight and every downstream number — R, the chart and the price — recalculates. Grid, water and hazard scores come from the benchmark datasets; community and political scores are illustrative and shown in italic.

30%
15%
15%
20%
20%
Total 100%
MarketRateG30%W15%H15%C20%M20%Rof 5.00Cohort medianvs median

G from load-interconnection wait times, normalised 1–10 years onto the 1.00–5.00 scale. W from WRI baseline water stress. H from FEMA National Risk Index. C from the community opposition benchmark. M covers convertibility, repatriation and contract enforceability. Rates are the current mid from the colocation rate benchmark.

Price vs. risk

TWO-AXIS VIEW

Each market by asking rate against its Azraq risk score. The cross-hairs are the cohort medians, splitting the field into four quadrants; the shaded band is one standard deviation either side of the median rate. No curve is fitted — see the note below the chart for why.

US International Latin America Outlier >1.5 SD Cohort median

Pricer

RISK BACK INTO PRICE

Pick a market to inherit its rate and risk score, then override either for a site that is not on the list. The base rate is what the market asks; everything above it is the cost of what the site carries.

Delay is costed as carrying cost on the contracted load at the base rate for the months lost. Mitigation capex is amortised straight-line across the term. Both feed the expected-cost method; the index method is shown alongside for comparison.